Primary outcome
speed up legal and commercial review while protecting standards
What we ship
clause playbook, contract review assistant, redline workflow, and fallback library
KPIs we report on
review cycle time, fallback usage, negotiation rounds, and contract leakage
What "automating contract review with AI" actually means
Automating contract review with AI is not a single product you buy. It is a workflow you redesign around AI as the operating layer. The agent handles the high-volume, high-structure tasks. Humans handle edge cases, exceptions, and trust-sensitive decisions. The system is instrumented to measure review cycle time, fallback usage, negotiation rounds, and contract leakage and improve weekly.
What changes by industry is the systems the agent integrates with, the data it retrieves over, the controls it operates under, and the KPIs it has to defend. The architecture is similar; the integration and the controls are different.
The architecture we use for AI contract review
- Frontier LLM — Claude, GPT-4-class, or Gemini. We benchmark candidates on a labelled test set during Discovery.
- Retrieval layer over your approved internal sources, with source citations on every output.
- Tool use for reads and writes against your operational stack (CRM, ERP, ticketing, data warehouse).
- Reviewer queue for low-confidence outputs. Confidence thresholds set per workflow.
- Evaluation harness — labelled test set, weekly accuracy reports, regression alerts.
- Versioned prompts and reviewer-action audit logs for traceability.
2 industries with a scoped engagement page for contract review. Each is a dedicated build with industry-specific systems, controls, and pricing.
How do you automate contract review with AI?+
We map your existing contract review workflow, identify high-volume and high-structure tasks, build an AI agent that handles those tasks, and route low-confidence cases to a human reviewer. The build connects to the systems your industry already runs on, runs against a labelled test set, and ships behind a reviewer queue before it sees production traffic. We measure review cycle time, fallback usage, negotiation rounds, and contract leakage from day one and improve weekly.
What is the best AI agent for contract review?+
There is no single off-the-shelf "best" agent for contract review — the right architecture depends on the systems and data of your industry. We typically combine a frontier LLM (Claude, GPT-4-class, or Gemini) with a retrieval layer over your approved sources, tool-use for your stack, and a reviewer queue. We benchmark candidates against a labelled test set during Discovery and pick the model with the best accuracy/cost ratio.
What does AI contract review cost?+
Three phases, billed separately. Discovery sprint: $8k. Build engagement: $30k–$40k. Run retainer: $4k–$6k / mo. ~$52k–$90k typical year 1 (~80% take the run option, regulated workflows need ongoing controls). Pricing varies slightly by industry — see the industry-specific pages below.
How long does it take to deploy AI contract review?+
Thin-slice in production in ~6 weeks after Discovery, full Build phase over 8-12 weeks. By day 90, review cycle time, fallback usage, negotiation rounds, and contract leakage is instrumented and you have a baseline against which to expand to adjacent workflows.
Which industries do you build AI contract review for?+
2 industries listed below have a scoped engagement page for contract review, each with industry-specific systems, controls, and KPIs. Common starting industries include Real Estate, Legal Services, and others. Don't see yours? We build for any sector — tell us about your workflow and we'll scope it.
What do we own, and what do you own?+
We own workflow design, prompts, retrieval architecture, evaluation harness, and weekly improvement. You own data access, policy, exception approval, and final commercial decisions. At the end of the engagement, every prompt, eval, and config is handed over — no lock-in.
Selected portfolio
Real builds tied to contract review
A rotating selection of engagements where contract review was a primary driver, drawn from our active portfolio. Sectors and scope are accurate; client identities are withheld under engagement NDAs.
Q2 2026
Authenticated remote voting platform — AGM resolutions, audit trail, EN/AR bilingual
Mid-market property operator · GCC region
Purpose-built e-voting system: per-unit cryptographic authentication, AGM resolution console for admins, real-time tally, full per-vote audit log. Federated identity with the OA management platform so owners use one login. Bilingual EN/AR from day one.
- Next.js + tRPC
- Per-unit auth + audit trail
- Bilingual EN/AR (next-intl)
Q3 2025
Radiology workflow application — case handling and reporting
Medical imaging operator · Europe
Application supporting radiology workflow: case intake, structured reporting, document handling, and quality-assurance loop. Designed for regulated medical-imaging context with audit trail and role-based access.
- Web app + secure storage
- Structured reporting
- Audit-trail compliance
Q2 2026
Internal staff portal — multi-association operations in role-based dashboards
Mid-market property operator · GCC region
Role-scoped portal for property managers, accountants, and maintenance staff. Reuses the OA data model from the management SaaS (zero duplication), adds multi-association switching, maintenance ticket lifecycle, financial reporting, and document storage tied to each association workspace.
- Next.js + tRPC
- NextAuth role-based access
- Drizzle ORM shared schema
Client identities withheld under engagement NDAs. Sector, geography, and scope are accurate. Full case studies on request.