AI teleradiology & cloud PACS platform development
AI Teleradiology & Cloud PACS Platform Development, HIPAA/GDPR-Grade
We build the owned teleradiology stack — cloud PACS, a zero-footprint DICOM viewer, AI-assisted reads, and encrypted DICOM transmission — HIPAA & GDPR compliant, 24/7. Not a per-study SaaS login: your platform, your archive, your PHI, fit to how your group reads. Production build, fixed-price.
Live Swiss teleradiology platform · 24/7 · 6-24h turnaround · 100% GDPR · Production in 6-10 weeks
In one sentence
An AI teleradiology + cloud PACS platform is owned imaging infrastructure — a cloud PACS that ingests and archives DICOM studies, a zero-footprint browser viewer for radiologists and referring sites, AI in the read path (prioritization, triage flags, report drafting, QA), and encrypted transmission end to end — and we deliver it as a fixed-price production build, HIPAA & GDPR-grade, integrated into your RIS/EHR, with full handover and no lock-in.
Key facts
- Uptime target
- 24/7 service availability
- Turnaround pattern
- 6-24h report TAT (live reference)
- Compliance
- HIPAA + GDPR control stack
- Discovery
- $5-8k · 2-3 weeks
- Build (production)
- $15-40k · 6-10 weeks
- Ownership
- Full handover · no lock-in
Our guarantee
- Production by week 7 or 50% back
- If we miss the production milestone, you get 50% back — written into the SOW.
- 7-day no-risk window
- Cancel within 7 days of signing, no questions asked. No lock-in after.
- Fixed-price, no lock-in
- Phased fixed-price engagement. Run is month-to-month — stop any time.
Senior operators, AI-augmented delivery · NIST AI RMF-aligned governance
The 2026 driver: a US radiologist shortage meets owned teleradiology infra
US hospitals, imaging centers, and teleradiology groups face a deepening radiologist shortage while imaging volume keeps climbing — the exact pressure that demands 24/7/365 coverage and sub-30-minute urgent turnaround. The first answer was per-study teleradiology SaaS. For groups with real volume and coverage obligations, that answer stops fitting: fees scale linearly forever, the workflow is the vendor's, and your PHI sits in their tenant. The next move is owned PACS + AI infrastructure — a platform you control, on your compliance terms. That is the teleradiology platform development and cloud PACS development work we ship.
What we build
The full owned stack — cloud PACS, a zero-footprint DICOM viewer, AI-assisted reads, encrypted DICOM transmission, the reporting workflow, and the governance layer underneath. Each one is scoped in Discovery and becomes a fixed-price line item in the Build SoW.
Cloud PACS
A cloud-hosted picture archiving and communication system that ingests, indexes, stores, and routes DICOM studies across modalities (CR, CT, MR, US, MG, NM). Multi-site aware, multi-tenant if you operate as a reading group, with lifecycle rules for hot/warm/cold archive and retention policy you control.
Zero-footprint DICOM viewer
A browser-based, zero-footprint viewer — no plug-in, no local install — so referring sites and radiologists open studies on any device. Window/level, MPR, measurement and annotation tools, hanging protocols, and side-by-side prior comparison, served over an encrypted session.
AI-assisted reads
AI in the read path where it earns its place: worklist prioritization, triage flags on time-critical findings, structured-report drafting, and automated QA checks. The model surfaces and pre-fills; the licensed radiologist reviews, edits, and signs. The diagnosis is always human-owned.
Encrypted DICOM transmission
Imaging in transit is encrypted end to end — TLS for web sessions, secured DICOM transfer (DICOM-TLS / secured gateways) between referring sites and the platform, and encryption at rest in the archive. Built so PHI never moves in the clear.
Reporting workflow
Worklist, assignment, dictation/structured reporting, sign-off, and report distribution back to the referring site. Turnaround clocks on every study so you can hold an SLA, with the urgent/STAT lane separated from routine volume.
Audit, access & governance layer
Role-based access control, full audit logging of every view and action, configurable data-residency, and the BAA / access-control scaffolding a HIPAA covered entity or business associate needs before go-live — designed to be reviewable by your compliance officer.
The compliance stack: HIPAA + GDPR, by design
For a HIPAA-compliant PACS development engagement, compliance is the architecture — not a wrapper added at the end. Six controls we design in before the workflow goes on top, documented in a control map your compliance officer can review.
HIPAA technical safeguards
Access control, audit controls, integrity controls, and transmission security mapped to the HIPAA Security Rule. Encryption in transit and at rest, unique user identification, automatic logoff, and emergency access procedures designed into the platform rather than bolted on.
GDPR alignment
Lawful-basis and data-minimization design, subject-rights handling, and EU data-residency where required. The Swiss teleradiology platform we operate runs at 100% GDPR compliance — the same control discipline carries over to US deployments.
Audit logging
Every study view, download, edit, report sign-off, and admin action is logged with user, timestamp, and context — the immutable trail an auditor or a breach investigation needs, and the basis for your accounting-of-disclosures obligations.
Access controls & RBAC
Role-based access so a referring physician, a reading radiologist, a technologist, and an administrator each see only what their role permits. Least-privilege by default, with multi-site scoping for reading groups that cover many facilities.
BAAs & vendor chain
Business Associate Agreement scaffolding for every subprocessor that touches PHI — hosting, model providers, transmission. We help you map the chain so there are no un-papered gaps before go-live.
Data residency
You choose where PHI lives — a specific US region, EU, or Swiss hosting — and the platform is built to keep it there. Residency is a configuration and a contract, not an afterthought.
Where AI helps the read — and where the radiologist stays in charge
AI lives in the read path around the diagnosis, never in it. On this AI PACS software development work, the model prioritizes the worklist, raises triage flags on time-critical findings, drafts the structured report, and runs automated QA before sign-off. In every case a licensed radiologist reviews, edits, and signs — the diagnosis is human-owned. That is the clinically and legally defensible architecture, it keeps the platform out of the most heavily regulated medical-device territory, and it is exactly how the live Swiss platform we operate runs today.
Proof — live in production
We are the exclusive tech partner behind a live Swiss teleradiology platform
This is the rare part. Our network is the exclusive technology partner behind a Swiss teleradiology provider — a cloud-based PACS, a zero-footprint DICOM viewer, AI-assisted diagnostic tooling, and encrypted transmission, on Swiss hosting, in production since 2025. It runs 24/7, with a 6-24 hour report turnaround and 100% GDPR compliance. Most dev shops have never shipped a compliant teleradiology stack — we operate one. For a US build, the hard architecture already exists and runs; the work is re-targeting it to HIPAA and your RIS/EHR environment.
Read the full write-up in the Swiss teleradiology PACS + AI platform case study. A reference conversation is available in your Discovery.
Integrations: RIS, EHR, HL7/FHIR, referring-site upload, billing
A teleradiology platform is only as useful as it is connected. We build RIS and EHR connectivity over HL7 v2 and FHIR (orders in, results and reports out), referring-site upload over both web and a secured DICOM gateway, and a billing handoff so completed reads flow to your billing or RCM system. Integrations are scoped concretely in Discovery against your actual systems — not left as open-ended "integrations as needed" — and become fixed-price line items in the Build SoW.
Build vs buy: owned platform vs per-study teleradiology SaaS
Side by side with renting a per-study platform (OnePACS, Medicai, and similar). SaaS is faster to switch on and right for low volume; an owned build wins on control, workflow fit, compliance posture, and unit economics once volume is real. We tell you in Discovery which side of the line you are on.
| Dimension | Per-study teleradiology SaaS | Owned platform (we build) |
|---|---|---|
| What you own | A login to someone else's platform; your studies live in their tenant | Your platform — source, configuration, archive, and PHI under your control and contracts |
| Cost shape | Per-study or per-seat fees that scale linearly with volume forever | Fixed-price build, then your own hosting + optional Run. Margin improves as volume grows |
| Workflow fit | Their worklist, their viewer, their report templates — you adapt to the product | Worklist, hanging protocols, report templates, and routing built around how your group actually reads |
| AI in the read | Whatever models the vendor bundles, on their roadmap | AI surfaces (triage, prioritization, drafting, QA) chosen and wired for your case mix; human keeps the diagnosis |
| Integrations | Limited to the vendor's connector catalog and pricing | RIS/EHR/HL7-FHIR, referring-site upload, and billing handoff built to your environment |
| Compliance posture | You inherit their attestations and data residency; PHI sits in their tenant | HIPAA + GDPR control stack designed around your obligations; you sign the BAAs and set residency |
| Exit | Switching means a study migration project and re-training on a new product | It is already yours. Full handover of code, infra, and runbooks. No lock-in. |
Engagement: Discovery → Build → Run, fixed-price, full handover
The detail that separates a production teleradiology platform from a demo — why owned infrastructure now, what "AI helps the read" means, why the compliance stack is the architecture, and the live proof asset behind it.
Why owned teleradiology infrastructure, and why 2026. The US is in a structural radiologist shortage while imaging volume keeps rising — the gap that teleradiology exists to close. The first wave of teleradiology was per-study SaaS: convenient, fast to switch on, and fine when you read a few studies a week. It stops being fine when you are a teleradiology group, an imaging center network, or an imaging startup with real volume and 24/7/365 coverage obligations, because per-study fees scale linearly forever, the workflow is the vendor's not yours, and your PHI lives in someone else's tenant. The buyers reaching this page are past renting: they need owned PACS + AI infrastructure they control, on their compliance terms, with the unit economics that come from owning the platform instead of paying per study. That is the build we do.
What "AI helps the read" actually means — and what it deliberately does not. The defensible place for AI in a 2026 teleradiology platform is the read path around the diagnosis, not the diagnosis itself. Concretely: AI prioritizes the worklist so time-critical studies rise to the top; it flags suspected urgent findings for triage so a potential intracranial bleed or pulmonary embolism is not sitting behind routine volume; it drafts the structured report so the radiologist edits rather than dictates from scratch; and it runs automated QA — checking for missing views, laterality mismatches, or incomplete reports before sign-off. In every one of these, the licensed radiologist reviews, edits, and signs; the model never owns the diagnosis. This is not a hedge. It is the clinically and legally defensible architecture, it keeps the platform out of the most heavily regulated medical-device territory, and it is exactly how the live Swiss platform we operate runs today.
The compliance stack is the platform, not a wrapper around it. For HIPAA covered entities and business associates, and for any EU-touching workflow under GDPR, compliance is not a feature you switch on at the end — it is the architecture. We design the access model (role-based, least-privilege, multi-site scoped), the audit trail (every view, download, edit, and sign-off logged immutably with user and timestamp), the encryption posture (in transit via TLS and secured DICOM transfer, at rest in the archive), and the data-residency boundary (a US region, EU, or Swiss hosting — your choice, enforced by configuration and contract) before we write the workflow on top. We map every subprocessor that touches PHI so the BAA chain has no gaps, and we produce a control map your compliance officer can actually review. HIPAA compliance is ultimately a property of the deployed system and your operating controls; our job is to build a system that supports it and to document it so it can be attested.
The proof asset, and why it is rare. Most teams pitching a teleradiology build have never shipped one. Our network is the exclusive technology partner behind a Swiss teleradiology provider — a cloud-based PACS, a zero-footprint DICOM viewer, AI-assisted diagnostic tooling, and encrypted transmission, live in production since 2025, running 24/7 with a 6-24 hour report turnaround and 100% GDPR compliance on Swiss hosting. That is real, operating, regulated medical-imaging infrastructure, not a prototype. For a US buyer, the value is that the hard architecture — the viewer, the transmission path, the AI-in-the-read pattern, the compliance discipline — already exists and runs; the work is re-targeting it to US HIPAA and state requirements and to your RIS/EHR environment, with that operating experience behind it. You can read the full write-up in the case study, and a reference conversation is available in your Discovery.
What buyers ask before commissioning a teleradiology / PACS build
How much does it cost to build an AI teleradiology / cloud PACS platform?+
Phased fixed-price. Discovery is $5-8k for 2-3 weeks and produces the architecture, the compliance control map (HIPAA + GDPR), the integration plan (RIS/EHR/HL7-FHIR), and a fixed-price Build statement of work. Build is typically $15-40k depending on scope — number of modalities, viewer tooling, AI surfaces, and integrations. Optional Run (monitoring, model/prompt upkeep, compliance support) is $2-6k/month, month-to-month. Hosting (your cloud or Swiss/EU/US region) is billed to you directly, not marked up.
How is this different from buying OnePACS, Medicai, or another per-study teleradiology SaaS?+
Per-study SaaS rents you a login; you read on their platform, your studies live in their tenant, and you pay per study or per seat forever. We build you an owned platform — your source, your archive, your PHI under your contracts and data residency, with the worklist, viewer, report templates, and AI surfaces fit to how your group actually reads. The trade-off is honest: SaaS is faster to switch on and right for low volume; an owned build wins on control, workflow fit, compliance posture, and unit economics once volume is real. We tell you in Discovery which side of that line you are on.
How long does it take to get to production?+
6-10 weeks from the day Discovery starts: 2-3 weeks of Discovery (architecture, compliance map, integration plan, Build SoW), then a 6-10 week Build with a deliberate milestone — a thin slice of the platform (ingest → viewer → read → report on a single modality and one referring site) running on real, de-identified studies by roughly week 6, before the full scope is finished. That checkpoint de-risks the build: you see the viewer, the transmission path, and the workflow on real data before scaling to all modalities and sites.
Do you handle FDA clearance, and is the AI a medical device?+
We build the platform — cloud PACS, zero-footprint viewer, encrypted transmission, reporting workflow, and the integration and compliance stack. The AI we wire in is decision-support: worklist prioritization, triage flags, report drafting, and QA. The licensed radiologist reviews and owns every diagnosis. Where a specific AI function would be regulated as a medical device (for example, an autonomous CADe/CADx claim), that clearance sits with the algorithm vendor or with you as the manufacturer of the claim — it is scoped explicitly in Discovery, and we design the workflow to keep a human in the diagnostic loop. We do not market the platform as a cleared diagnostic device.
How is PHI handled, and is the platform HIPAA compliant?+
PHI handling, access, residency, and retention are scoped in Discovery before any data moves. The platform is built to the HIPAA Security Rule safeguards — encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access, audit logging of every view and action, unique user IDs, and emergency-access procedures — plus GDPR alignment where EU data is involved. We help you paper the BAA chain across every subprocessor that touches PHI (hosting, model providers, transmission gateways). HIPAA compliance is a property of the deployed system and your operating controls; we build the system to support it and document the control map for your compliance officer to review.
What turnaround SLAs can the platform support?+
The platform clocks turnaround on every study and separates the urgent/STAT lane from routine volume, so you can hold a published SLA. The Swiss teleradiology provider we build and operate for runs 24/7 with a 6-24 hour report turnaround pattern; the urgent lane is engineered to surface time-critical studies to the top of the worklist via AI triage flags. The exact SLA is yours to set — the platform gives you the prioritization, routing, and measurement to commit to it and prove it.
Can it run across multiple sites and referring facilities?+
Yes — multi-site is a core requirement, not an add-on. Referring facilities upload or push studies (web upload or secured DICOM gateway), studies land in a shared, access-scoped worklist, and each site sees only its own data under role-based access. Reading groups that cover many facilities get per-site scoping, per-site SLAs, and per-site billing handoff. Hanging protocols and report templates can vary by site or by reading radiologist.
Does the AI make the diagnosis?+
No. AI helps the read — it prioritizes the worklist, flags time-critical findings for triage, drafts structured reports, and runs automated QA checks. A licensed radiologist reviews, edits, and signs every report; the diagnosis is always human-owned. We design the read path that way on purpose: it is the clinically and legally defensible model, and it is how the live Swiss platform operates.
What integrations do you build — RIS, EHR, HL7/FHIR, billing?+
We build the integration layer the platform needs to fit your environment: RIS and EHR connectivity over HL7 v2 and FHIR (orders in, results/reports out), referring-site upload (web and secured DICOM), and a billing handoff so completed reads flow to your billing or RCM system. Integrations are scoped concretely in Discovery against your actual systems and become fixed-price line items in the Build SoW — no open-ended 'integrations as needed.'
What do we own at the end, and is there lock-in?+
You own all of it — source code, configuration, the archive, the integration code, prompts and evals for the AI surfaces, and the operational runbooks — handed over at the end of Build with no license or lock-in. Hosting is in your cloud or a region you choose, under your accounts. Run is month-to-month and optional; you can take the platform fully in-house at any point. The whole engagement is built around the fact that this is critical, regulated infrastructure you must be able to operate without us.
Have you actually built and operated a teleradiology platform before?+
Yes — and it is live. Our network is the exclusive technology partner behind a Swiss teleradiology provider: a cloud-based PACS, a zero-footprint DICOM viewer, AI-assisted diagnostic tooling, and encrypted transmission, running 24/7 with a 6-24 hour report turnaround and 100% GDPR compliance, on Swiss hosting, in production since 2025. That is the rare part — most dev shops have never shipped a compliant teleradiology stack. We re-target that exact architecture to US HIPAA and state requirements and your EHR/RIS environment.
Track record
- 16
- production workflows shipped
- US · UAE · EU
- regions delivered in
- Week 7
- production guarantee or 50% back
- NIST AI RMF
- aligned governance + audit logs
Client names are withheld under NDA — we don't put logos we can't stand behind on the page. Founder-led delivery (ex-UBS, Paris Dauphine–PSL); anonymized case studies and a reference call are available in your Discovery.
High-intent reads
Start with Discovery
Build owned teleradiology infrastructure — production in 6-10 weeks.
Discovery ($5-8k, 2-3 weeks) delivers the architecture, the HIPAA + GDPR control map, the RIS/EHR integration plan, and a fixed-price Build SoW. The only commitment to start. After Discovery you can commit to Build, take the plan in-house, or stop — your call. Built by the team that operates a live Swiss teleradiology platform.
Fixed-price · Reply in 1 business day
Start a project →